Procurement & Sourcing · Free calculator

Supplier Quote Comparison Calculator

The cheaper supplier quote is frequently the more expensive one. Unit prices are only the visible layer of a landed comparison: freight terms differ, duty applies to different bases, and a quote that looks 8% cheaper per unit can arrive at your warehouse costing more once shipping and taxes are stacked on. Comparing quotes at the unit-price line is how procurement teams buy the wrong deal with confidence.

This calculator compares two supplier quotes on a landed basis: unit price and freight for each, over your order quantity, with duty applied to the dutiable value. The output is the landed cost per unit and total for each supplier, and the real difference between them — the number the negotiation should actually be about.

Quick answer

Landed comparison = (units × unit price + freight) × (1 + duty%) for each quote, compared per unit. Supplier B at $9.20/unit with $3,500 freight versus Supplier A at $10.00/unit with $2,000 freight, on 1,000 units at 10% duty: B lands at $13.97/unit, A at $13.20 — the "cheaper" quote costs $770 more. Always compare landed, never per-unit.

Interactive estimate

Supplier A — landed per unitTotal $13,200.00
$13.20
Supplier B — landed per unitTotal $13,970.00
$13.97
Landed differenceSupplier A lower under these inputs
$770.00
Difference per unit
$0.77

Estimates only, based entirely on the assumptions you enter. This is not a quote or an offer — actual pricing is route-dependent and depends on corridor, payment method, amount and applicable fees, and is disclosed in full on a KeyBS Pay quote before you approve anything.

Get a Business Quote

The formula

Landed total = (Units × Price + Freight) × (1 + Duty%/100); Landed unit = Landed total ÷ Units

Freight enters the dutiable value because most customs regimes assess duty on CIF — cost, insurance and freight — so an expensive freight leg is taxed as well as paid. This is why distant or poorly-connected suppliers carry a double penalty their unit price never shows.

The model applies one duty rate to both quotes, which holds when both ship the same goods from the same origin. When origins differ, duty rates can differ too — preferential trade agreements can zero the duty from one origin and not the other, a gap the Trade Agreement Duty Comparison calculator prices separately. That difference routinely outweighs unit-price gaps.

How to use this calculator

  1. 1

    Normalise the quotes to the same incoterm

    An FOB quote and a CIF quote are not comparable as written — add your own freight and insurance to the FOB side first, or use the FOB vs CIF Calculator.

  2. 2

    Get real freight figures per supplier

    Freight depends on origin port, volume and mode — quote it per supplier, not as one shared assumption.

  3. 3

    Confirm the duty treatment of each origin

    Same goods, different origin can mean different duty under trade agreements. Enter the applicable rate.

  4. 4

    Compare landed per unit — then negotiate

    The landed gap is the true price difference. Take it back to the preferred supplier; unit-price gaps often close when a supplier sees the landed comparison.

Beyond landed cost: the risk-adjusted comparison

Landed cost equalises the quotes financially; it does not equalise them commercially. Payment terms differ — a supplier requiring 50% deposit against another’s 30% ties up materially more working capital, which the Purchase Order Cash Flow Calculator prices. Lead times differ, defect rates differ, and communication quality differs, each with a cost that surfaces after the order, not on the quote.

A workable discipline for repeat purchases: track each supplier’s realised landed cost — including rework, delays and payment friction — against their quoted landed cost over several orders. The gap between quoted and realised is the supplier’s honesty premium, and it belongs in every future comparison alongside the new quotes.

Payment costs: the comparison line most quotes omit

Paying the two suppliers can itself cost differently. A supplier banking in a well-connected financial centre receives a clean two-day wire; one banking through a thin correspondent network attracts deductions and delays that effectively raise the invoice. Currency matters too: a supplier invoicing in their local currency moves FX cost and risk onto you — priceable with the FX Margin Calculator — while a USD invoice keeps it visible.

For orders into or out of African markets and China, corridor economics vary enough to be a real comparison line: fees, FX margin and settlement speed differ by route. KeyBS Pay’s corridor pages document these per route, and a quote shows the committed cost of paying each supplier before you choose between them — payment cost is a procurement input, not an afterthought.

Common use cases

Two-supplier sourcing decisions

Land both quotes properly before awarding an order on unit price.

Renegotiation preparation

Show the incumbent the landed gap to a challenger quote and let arithmetic negotiate.

Origin switching analysis

Test whether a nearer origin’s higher unit price wins on freight and duty.

Freight sensitivity checks

See how much freight inflation moves the ranking between suppliers.

Automate this with the API

Add indicative payment-corridor pricing as a comparison line between suppliers.

curl "https://keybs.io/api/v1/tools/corridor-pricing?corridor=ghana-china" \
  -H "x-api-key: YOUR_FREE_KEY"
Free Tools API docs and key registration

Frequently asked questions

The suppliers quote different incoterms — how do I compare?

Normalise before comparing: convert both to a landed basis by adding your own freight and insurance costs to whichever quote excludes them. An FOB quote plus your freight quote is comparable to a CIF quote; neither is comparable as written. The FOB vs CIF Calculator on this site does the normalisation for one supplier.

Should I include payment and FX costs in the comparison?

For close comparisons, yes. Different origins mean different payment corridors, with different fees, FX margins and deduction risk — differences of 0.5–2% of invoice value are common. On a comparison where the landed gap is under 3%, the payment corridor can decide the ranking.

How do I compare more than two suppliers?

Run the calculator pairwise against your current best, keeping the winner as the standing benchmark — a knockout structure that scales to any shortlist. For a full side-by-side of provider-style fee structures, the Cross-Border Payment Comparison Calculator uses a three-way layout you can repurpose.

What about MOQ differences between suppliers?

A lower unit price at a higher minimum order quantity is partly an inventory financing cost in disguise: more cash tied up longer, more storage, more obsolescence risk. Price the cash side with the Purchase Order Cash Flow Calculator using each supplier’s MOQ and terms — the "cheaper" MOQ deal often loses after financing.

Do sample and tooling costs belong in the landed comparison?

For a single order, yes — amortise one-off costs (samples, tooling, certification) across the order quantity and add them to the landed unit cost. For an ongoing relationship, amortise across realistic lifetime volume instead. Omitting them flatters new-supplier quotes against incumbents whose tooling is already paid.

Can KeyBS Pay help with the payment leg of either choice?

Yes — request a quote for paying each supplier’s corridor and the comparison gains a committed payment-cost line: executable rate, disclosed fee (from 1.5%, route-dependent) and exact receive amount per route. Escrow-style structured payments for new supplier relationships are available on eligible routes.

Replace assumptions with a committed quote

Executable rate, disclosed fee, committed receive amount — before you pay anything.

Request a Quote
Keep exploring

Recommended for you

Ask AI about this page